Forest and trees people, forest and trees.
Frogdreaming - “Why can't people think these things through?”
Trust me Frogdreaming, I really am trying to think these things through. I willing admit that I am one of the “entrenched investors” of the “target audience” in your post.
Frogdreaming – ” The AS has been 10 billion since then. The AS is a matter of public record.” Post #75192
Frogdreaming – ” So the answer is YES there are links to show the OS is ten billion shares.” Post #75200
Frogdreaming – “ The company has sold all of it's available stock, they therefore have no interest in attracting new investors.”
Ergo (as EarnestDD likes to say) you confidently state/argue that – they (RCCH) has no interest in attracting new investors because all ten billion authorized share have been issued and sold as outstanding shares. And that there are “links to show the OS is ten billion shares.”
You continue with the statement “Until they (RCCH) have new shares to sell they would just as soon remain invisible to any uncommitted investors. They need to keep current investors at bay until they can arrange for a new supply of shares to sell.”
You expressly state that in your view RCCH has exhausted all revenue streams from current share structure and imply that RCCH’s business plan is to “just as soon remain invisible “ until they can increase the authorized shares.
I am a current investor so you expressly state that RCCH needs to keep me “at bay until they can arrange for a new supply of shares to sell.”
Am I correct in following/understanding your logical argument so far?
To continue, in your post you counsel train to realize why RCCH is using the RCC-IWS website as a form of communication.
”Instead of complaining about why the news isn't being disseminated through normal investment channels, why not try to realize why they are using the channels they are?
Investment news services are aimed at specific audiences, new investors, the legitimate investment community, the business world.
Since these channels are not being used, then that is clearly not the target demographic that these information packets are aimed at.”
Now we come to the forest and trees part. Your statements in the last part of your post got me pondering again.
“They are not participating in the legitimate business world,….."
Did you really mean to say that RCCH is “not participating in the legitimate business world….”? That is a very broad and inclusive statement with very negative implications. Not participating in a legitimate business world could be read as participating in an illegitimate business world. Did you intentionally want to leave that impression with your readers? Do you want the opportunity to retract that “not participating in the legitimate business world” statement and narrow your statement to a more neutral statement about RCCH preference for alternate communications channels?
Frogdreaming – ”It isn't poor management, it is a very focused and efficient strategy.”
As I said before, the entertainment value of this board has skyrocketed. Are you now saying that CEO Gene Newton is a very focused manager? That he is not only focused, but also capable of conceiving an efficient business strategy? That he is not only capable of conceiving but is also successfully implementing an efficient business strategy? This is a wonderful development. I appreciate your candor.
Forest and trees people, forest and trees.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
