Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,824.66
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
24,378.40
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
48,185.80
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
94.73
(
0.30%
)
Bitcoin
71,892.96
(
0.15%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435779
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

mickeybritt

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 93
Posts 15732
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/04/2003

mickeybritt

Re: sloane6 post# 271140

Wednesday, 09/23/2009 9:32:45 AM

Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:32:45 AM

Post# of 435779
sloane6

It appears that by giving a no infirgnement that the judge thinks Nokia saves a couple of hundred million earning him the money if he is corrupt. By granting the patents as valid and enforeceable that puts the onerous on all others to prove they don't infringe these valid patents. I don't think the judge himself believes what he ruled. I think he did about all he could do to not make what almost appears as obvious to grey the matter of being corrupt. Just a opinion not a fact, but it still keeps smelling mighty fishy to me.

JMO
Mickey
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News