InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mickeybritt]

infinite_q

I am not joking when I say this. I think IDCC would do well to hire you as a consultant. I think your points and apparently your knowledge of the engineering and the legal aspect might be a good thing for the legal department to listen to you on.

I would like for the legal department when the oppositions uses the term skilled in the art to have the opposition define what the word skilled means and how skilled do they mean when they say skilled, is it a little skilled which is still skilled? I mean if they are going to disect words then lets disect skilled. Which when disected might prove that one is not skilled in the art but just has some knowledge. Let me add this and since you are not skilled in the art of engineering how do you know your expert is skilled? I assume you just have to take his or her word as they are skilled.

I hate having to prove words not facts. When the facts are the SOB is using the patented technology and the words are what they are using trying to avoid paying by definition of using words not new ideas.

Another simple thing to do is bring a phone without the IDCC technology in it and say make this one work witout out the IDCC technology since you are skilled at having technology that circumvents these patents. Do not use a single IDCC patent and make it work. If you can do that and it performs all the features it does with the IDCC technology you win, if not then pay up. In fact if I was IDCC I would have a reversed engineered phone or multiple phones if necessary and say each one of these has our technology removed this is what the phone does absent our technology and what it should do with our technology having a phone with the technology in it. Go to the show me style of what have you got to add to this with and with out works or don't work.
JMO
Mickey