Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,823.26
(
0.60%
)
US TECH 100
24,351.20
(
0.44%
)
Dow Jones
48,248.22
(
0.71%
)
Brent Oil
93.22
(
-1.71%
)
Bitcoin
72,559.66
(
2.01%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435773
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

olddog967

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 81
Posts 12240
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2003

olddog967

Member Level

Re: infinite_q post# 271120

Tuesday, 09/22/2009 10:34:32 PM

Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:34:32 PM

Post# of 435773
infinite: Thanks for your answers. I would say you have a pretty good background to comment on the technical aspects of what happened.

The problem is that besides the straight technical aspects used to define a patent, legal considerations are involved. For example you mentioned the conflict on how the word "apparatus" in the preamble should be defined. Below is an article that has in Part II a lengthy discussion in regard to Claim Preamble Limitations. IMO it is not for us mere mortals to try and follow the legal convolutions involved.

http://www.khpatent.com/files/9492SJK_Patent_Claim_Construction.pdf
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News