Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,782.81
(
2.51%
)
US TECH 100
24,183.06
(
2.72%
)
Dow Jones
47,909.92
(
2.85%
)
Brent Oil
95.73
(
0.94%
)
Bitcoin
70,739.61
(
-0.55%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435772
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

mickeybritt

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 93
Posts 15732
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/04/2003

mickeybritt

Re: revlis post# 266828

Friday, 08/14/2009 7:14:44 PM

Friday, August 14, 2009 7:14:44 PM

Post# of 435772
revlis

Not only do they have that essential patent they now have confirmed valid patents by the ITC. Now its up to IDCC to do some reconstructing I guess, damnded if I know how they was valid but needed some more reconstructing. I don't know much about patents and construction. If they wasn't properly constructed how did they get the patent, and then reaffirmed?

Things that make you go hmmm, I wonder if the judge has a new yacht waiting on him? I am being snide but this ruling makes no sense, its like you had more points on the scoreboard but the official said you lost.

JMO
Mickey
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News