News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 499
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/29/2003

Re: hasher post# 6623

Tuesday, 09/14/2004 1:38:31 PM

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:38:31 PM

Post# of 23724
Hasher, Ok thanks. Much like the Patent Office still says too. No acquired by or assigned to LB or PWTC at the top of the battery patent like other patents say many times.
Wait now it says something different.
From
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search....
"Assignee: Advanced Patent Technology, Incorporated (Las Vegas, NV)"

Is that AS's company or someone else’s?

Wait wrong Snaper patent. Here's the battery one.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search...

And this from 2000 when the patent first came out and you would think it would have been assigned over to PWTC by then if sold to it before then. But no.
http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=US06060198__







Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y