News Focus
News Focus
Followers 63
Posts 79209
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/13/2003

Re: DesertDrifter post# 79729

Friday, 07/17/2009 11:31:48 AM

Friday, July 17, 2009 11:31:48 AM

Post# of 576019
The CT firefighters had a complaint and Repubs exploited them.
The firefighters tried to claim Judge Sonia Sotomayor was biased in her judgement - even though the decision they objected to was reached by a PANEL of judges, based on what they believed to be the law. Do you think each time one of the other judges on that PANEL renders a decision they disagree with the CT firefighters will take to the press and object? I don't either - their goal was to criticize ONE judge on that PANEL. Unfortunately for them, that ONE judge has a 19yr judicial history demonstrating she is not biased in her rulings.
"If a judge's ruling is overturned by a higher court..." - What you apparently do not know is in the case of the CT firefighters, it was a PANEL of judges - not ONE judge.
The SC overturned the lower court's decision by a 5-4 vote, which is hardly a majority decision and shows there was disagreement even between the Supremes on the merits of the firefighter's case.

I don't fault these firefighters for taking their case to the SC, but I am sorry they allowed themselves to be exploited by the Repubs and didn't do their own homework and look into Judge Sotomayor's 19yr history on the bench which shows she IS NOT biased.















You don't want revenge to be too expensive, even if it's emotionally
satisfying.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today