The point of disagreement within the scientific community isn't about CRP causation, but whether inflammation is a separate causation path potentially separately benefitted by statins. And CRP is a reliable proxy for that path.
Agreed. When viewed under this lens, the NYT article in #msg-39219495 is not one of Gina Kolata’s better efforts.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”