InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,631.22
(
0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,879.20
(
0.44%
)
Dow Jones
40,211.72
(
0.53%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
-0.25%
)
Bitcoin
63,670.84
(
4.75%
)
Post# of 30387
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

mata hari

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 984
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2009

mata hari

Re: None

Thursday, 06/11/2009 11:13:08 PM

Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:13:08 PM

Post# of 30387
If Abbott wanted to return the product or had initiated it, I think the release would have just stated that Abbott had given notice to return the license.

Why would Abbott participate in a scam to conjure up a cover story of higher royalties? That creates liability on Abbotts part so I don't think the new terms were created to scam bocx investors.

yes gs. i agree with your message 12729.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up