Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,611.83
(
0.44%
)
US TECH 100
23,481.60
(
0.35%
)
Dow Jones
46,669.88
(
0.36%
)
Brent Oil
108.40
(
1.24%
)
Bitcoin
68,819.97
(
-0.06%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 359151
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

ergo sum

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 89
Posts 54452
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/13/2001

ergo sum

Member Level

Re: fireboat post# 80771

Wednesday, 08/18/2004 4:07:48 PM

Wednesday, August 18, 2004 4:07:48 PM

Post# of 359151
I don't understand the logic behind this. They hired a lawyer. All that seems to suggest to me is that what they are doing is legal. So if they have legally given away 30+% of the company already, what is to stop them legally from giving away even more?
UCAD clearly states in their reports that the only way they make money is by selling shares. I assume this is perfectly legal too.
Why do you assume this is good for the shareholders?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today