Ok, one more wasted post. The boston data is raw data. Roughly sort a like an MRI machine detecting a single shift in spin state of a molecule. The machine then interpolates and interprets the data and creates an image we can all understand. 70% raw detection rate is not what CRAM is all about. 70% translates into virtually 100% detection rate if their preliminary raw numbers are right. That's it. Please spare me another post.