Maybe it's better if they not pay any attention to overzealous shareholders who post on message boards?
If they don't pay any attention, there's nothing to deny.
Problem is, some may pay to much attention to rumors and speculation and instead of discussions, some get nasty.
But should we then assume that when they did address previous negative issues that it also included any Massive Naked Short problems that might have been created by Pino?
Are you/we reading/assuming something that has not been actually put in writing by Paychest stating for example that all Massive Naked Short issues have also been cleared up ?
We don't rely upon shareholder post here to provide facts, do
we? or maybe some do and that's why our discussions become pretty one sided.
Maybe that's why I leave sometimes and reflect for awhile. lol
And when I do return, nothing changes. Same merry-go-round. Same posters saying the same things over and over and over and for what purpose, only they seem to know.
Market Data 
Markets 
