News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 509
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2008

Re: jr1948 post# 16483

Friday, 04/24/2009 10:32:24 AM

Friday, April 24, 2009 10:32:24 AM

Post# of 22460
You would be 180 degrees wrong on that, sir. I know it was a long read, my previous post. But if you had taken the time you would have seen that I have been around since last June. And I have certainly read and am familiar with their history back through 2004. It is an interesting story with a lot of bad luck. And I know about the criminal history of former company officials involved in bank fraud. I am also aware of Eugene's insider trading activities in the early `80s. Like I said in the previous post, I am not trying to pump Quest and I am certainly not trying to entice anyone to buy in now. But I am quite sure that it is not the scam that some people try to paint here. I haven't posted here much until lately. But for some reason I felt compelled to throw my opinion against the scam theory. You guys can stick with it. I only provide an alternate theory that is food for thought to liven things up here and drag it away from that same old "it's a scam and any one who falls for it is a sucker" crap. I know that my theory makes no difference in the pocket books of Quest's investors who lost out on it. Like I said the outcome is substantially the same whether it is a failed, legitimate business attempt as I said or whether it really is a scam.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today