Understood; what I’m alleging is that VRUS is exaggerating the practical consequence of Clevudine’s MoA. Rather than the handwaving that VRUS serves up to investors, I want to see hard data that Clevudine is different from other HBV nukes in a material way.
I’m skeptical that Clevudine monotherapy will generate the 40% SVR rate that VRUS claims to be seeking in the French study where Clevudine is going head-to-head vs Viread. If it can, I will of course be impressed.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.