News Focus
News Focus
Followers 84
Posts 10865
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/19/2002

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 61182

Wednesday, 04/01/2009 8:31:00 AM

Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:31:00 AM

Post# of 72325
Sounds like someone didn't do their *due*.

when there is no link
it's not verifiable


There is no link. It is a printed document that is available if one desires to get the
real information as opposed to pontificating over what may have actually occurred.

People can make the calls and interpret what they hear and then decide for themselves
what they believe the true events of the conference were and if they are so willing they
can also obtain the published proceedings from the conference without having to attend.
As is often said, it is not rocket science.

If people also knew how conferences work they would also know that the papers would be
submitted prior to the conference so as to be included in the printed proceedings.
A quick glance at the web site indicates that the abstract had to be submitted by
January 31, 2009. I guess it's possible even ECT could do that, ya think?

it might be worth discussing

It would appear it is as people have been replying and 'conversing' about the information
I posted.

The words with no *basis* are direct quotes from the abstract of Daniel Imbeau.
Are you saying he made this stuff up? That would kind of explain a lot.

Regards.

Out the LAN card, down the cable, through the router,
out the gateway, to the ISP...nothin' but net!

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today