InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mschere]

Question..If Nokia were correct in their collusion allegation..would not Sony have also been VICTIMIZED and possibly join Nokia in their action? It is interesting that Sony who was not a party to the Ericsson vs. IDCC litigation, acted in their interest by co-signing a 2G handset license with IDCC independent of litigation..IMO:For Ericsson to have "secret agreements" with IDCC is patently absurd..Sony had to have INPUT on the TOTAL LITIGATION and MEDIATION RECORD in determining a fair and reasonable Infrastructure rate and amount for IDCC's 2G license with Ericsson..and a fair and reasonable rate for 2G handsets for IDCC's 2G license with Sony/Ericsson..Sony's action in signing with Ericsson for a 2G license for handsets,will VALIDATE IDCC's claim that Sony/Ericsson is a proper trigger for Nokia for the entire Arbitration Panel....

From the exhibits, NOK is claiming to the arb panel that IDCC and ERICY have secret agreements not contained elsewhere that they are trying to hide and conceal from NOK. NOK is also claiming that IDCC is withholding documents.