News Focus
News Focus
Followers 38
Posts 4929
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/01/2001

Re: boxsterX post# 18129

Wednesday, 02/18/2009 8:14:08 PM

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:14:08 PM

Post# of 27567
The odd thing boxster however is the testimony of MOSH Holdings LP attorney Sharman. He is questioned by PXD attorney and objects to the plaintiff experts data being used for the auction but he never says he opposes the auction unless he did and i am missing it. But i dont see him opposing the auction anywhere. Only the data being used. You even have the PXD lawyers even saying in the response to the contempt motion that the plaintiff should file an injunction to stop auction if they wish but that the contempt argument is groundless.

And for you smile you even have the Mosh LP lawyer Sharman on record saying Mosh Holdings LP represents ALL UNITHOLDERS. Its in the defenses response to the contempt motion

The proud man counts his newspaper clippings, the humble man his blessings.” Bishop Fulton J. Sheen

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today