InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253383
Next 10
Followers 840
Posts 120577
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: poorgradstudent post# 71860

Tuesday, 01/20/2009 9:42:48 PM

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:42:48 PM

Post# of 253383

Ablynx: This is troubling.

I agree—in more ways than one. I thought the PR was unusually disingenuous even by biotech standards.

This target is clinically validated, so you can't assume this is a case of "drug works but target isn't clinically relevant." Also, P&G is dropping a drug to a validated target in late preclinical. It's unlikely that they could have made a tangible determination of whether or not the drug has the efficacy to compete with denosumab at this point. That suggests to me that there was a show stopper of some sort. Immunogenicity or the possibility that the drug is too rapidly cleared are possibilities that come to mind.

To date, this hasn’t been seen with ALX-0081/0681, although these programs are still very early.

My overall assessment of Ablynx is that is has some buyout vig, but not much else to make it attractive for investing. The main problem is competition: there are manifold companies developing small antibody-like drugs, and hence there’s a high probability that one or more of these techniques will prove to be better than nanobodies. Investing in Ablynx is (IMO) tantamount to a bet that some Big Pharma buys them out before it becomes common knowledge that another company’s platform is superior. This is not necessarily a bad bet, but it’s not a bet I’m inclined to make.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.