Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,505.20
(
0.82%
)
US TECH 100
28,815.52
(
0.79%
)
Dow Jones
50,062.04
(
0.74%
)
Brent Oil
103.72
(
0.02%
)
Bitcoin
81,613.14
(
2.94%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 57929
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

atlshrug

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 96
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

atlshrug

Re: RBlatch post# 22672

Friday, 01/16/2009 10:00:48 AM

Friday, January 16, 2009 10:00:48 AM

Post# of 57929
"And I still stand by my statemnt below that Cortex could easily issue a press release "generally" (I repeat - generally) updating where any negotiations stand without breaking any laws or comprimising their negotiating positions"

Blatch, even a general PR would require the permission of the other party(s), or you run the risk irritating them - something COR can hardly afford to do right now. If you were the other party in the negotiations, can you think of any reason why you would allow COR to go public with any nuance of the negotiations?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today