"As to the carping about radio silence: I'm still baffled by complaints that Cortex isn't keeping people up to date on the state of negotiations. Just absurd. If someone can give an example of a company which does provide play-by-play, status reports on partnering negotiations, let me know. My stated timeframe was and is January. If we don't hear something by month's end, I'll get nervous--alright, I'm already nervous, then I'll escalate. But one thing I won't do is question whether Cortex management takes this situation and their responsibility to shareholders seriously. That is complete BS."
Neuro. The only thing that is complete BS around here is your lack of criticism of a company that certainly deserves its fair share.
Your white knight position of protector of all things negative cast towards Cortex or its management becomes highly suspicious. I realize that you must maintain a "working relationship" with those management peoples inside of the companys that you "report" on, but at what point does it knowingly or unknowingly sway your objectivity?
I appreciate your informative contributions to this message board, however, your constant, unrelenting defense of management becomes hollow in light of the situation before us.
And I still stand by my statemnt below that Cortex could easily issue a press release "generally" (I repeat - generally) updating where any negotiations stand without breaking any laws or comprimising their negotiating positions. If they cared about their shareholders, they would keep them more informed and not hide behind laws that were not intended to be hidden behind.
"They could very easily issue a press release giving an update on where money matters stand and {b}generally where any negotiqations stand for RD."
I wish you a prosperous new year.
Cordially,
RBlatch
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
