Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,592.09
(
0.38%
)
US TECH 100
29,559.20
(
0.46%
)
Dow Jones
51,068.46
(
0.79%
)
Brent Oil
91.43
(
-0.81%
)
Bitcoin
73,551.47
(
0.02%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 436127
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

JimLur

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 160
Posts 18889
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

JimLur

Member Level

Re: mickeybritt post# 243121

Friday, 01/02/2009 7:54:18 AM

Friday, January 02, 2009 7:54:18 AM

Post# of 436127
Mickey, IDCC does own that patent but that ownership can still be contested in court. Any company can file a suit and claim the patent office was wrong to grant that patent therefore the patent isn't valid.

The only way that might happen is for IDCC to sue someone for infringing the patent.

At that point any company could claim the patent isn't valid or their products don't infringement that patent.

We might be getting over our heads here regarding legal issues so lets wait and see what the legal eagles say about this.

"Being 'over the hill is much better than being under it!"

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News