I think you missed my point about it, Due. There is a difference between 300 or 500 shareholders (for example) having all the shares plus 20mil more as compared to ONE person having all the shares plus shareholders still holding millions.
You can't coordinate getting all shareholders together in a large group effort because when only 50%, for example, participate, it doesn't work. But, if just one person (Hemi!) has all the shares or at least most of them then it becomes simple to prove the point and the manipulation because you need only a handful of the million+ shareholders to be your "group" to prove the problem.
If Hemi bought air shares, no problem and even better!
Main point that I guess you didn't get is that it is nearly impossible to prove what is thought to be going on when there are hundreds of shareholders but put the entire o/s in the hands of 10 people or less (which would NOT be difficult if the price stays here and downright EASY if they drop it much more) and now the PROOF that is needed is there. Hard to obtain the proof from 300, easier if 30, and down right simple if just 3. That's the point.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
