News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 499
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/29/2003

Re: None

Friday, 06/11/2004 8:06:14 AM

Friday, June 11, 2004 8:06:14 AM

Post# of 23724
Hasher are you free to tell what you know or subject to a real or pragmatic ie voluntary gag order?

Yes or NO?

For example:
Was the catella tested and proven battery fit for production or still needed more work done on it?

Was the sweden group going to build the battery or did it fall through for various reasons?

Did that cause WM his job, if not explain why LB did not find a permanent replacement like he said he would?

Would a big brand name battery company now have manufactured the battery in exchange for royalty fees to PWTC?

Was WM yanked from the CEO job because ironically LB did not want the battery going into production? Perhaps because the industry doesn't want it out there? Or the oil companies don't?

Obviously the dismissing of WM and not finding a permanent CEO replacement like LB promised to, angered AS so much he resigned which caused the court case over who owns the battery. That to me sounds like either the battery wasn't good enough or LB didn't want the battery produced?

Or does LB just want a company that he can continue to milk and under his control obviously, regardless whether the battery was ready for production or not?

Could Dr. P be trusted because of his Bechtel oil pipeline related connections and past member of Bush Sr's energy cabinet that obviously favors oil over any technology that can lessen peoples' demand for oil? And a large part of the problem? After all Dr. P. is named in the counter law suit by inventor AS.

Hasher if you can't answer any of the specifics above can you at least answer whether you think LB is being handled by others not to produce the battery, or just his own greed and incompetence and stupidity that the battery is not being produced yet?


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y