Well you might be a fan of that but it goes against what is required by the sec finra and is not favorable to those who cannot afford full time coverage or a higher rate.
Seems you are out of that element, and you do not care, that's your right, but frankly you are not affected by the laws governing this situation nor are you a promoter
I can respect your opine but frankly you dont' really have a bearing or effect.
I suspect you have other reasons for being here.
Really it seems you are off base with my theory in the first place already, the entire program is designed to separate the posts that are for jobs we are working, sorry you dont like that but that is not the issue .
Why should we have a disclaimer on a post that is not about a stock or a trade that is not under contract?
give me a break thats foolish in my opinion
"In other words make it cheaper to fly the promoter flag at all times because in all reality that's the way it should be."??????
makes little to zero sense talk about paying for something your not using, doubly so now under your idea, worse putting a disclaimer on a post that was not compensated for creates too much room for off topic and tos violations.
drop the axe grinding about promoters...it is no secret you despise them, so coming here to grind that axe by suggesting more ways for us to pay extra and for other reasons is an obvious stalker issue.
pop quiz greedy how many times a day do you slander me and my profession? that seems to be the real issue here, and we both know it. not a day goes by I do not hear about that obsession, why else do you think I have you on ignore?
now should you decide to level an unbiased opine, I would be delighted to continue the discussion, but frankly with the lack of reasonabilty being displayed on these terms of this program, coupled with the obvious public disdain of promoters, this motive is already apparent...as for the personal grudge this contention that it does not exist is 100% false.