News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 33
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2004

Re: got2belucky post# 2190

Sunday, 06/06/2004 10:29:44 PM

Sunday, June 06, 2004 10:29:44 PM

Post# of 53982
got2belucky

Thank you for your support.

Yes, indeed I am finding this board is obviously meant to be a "pro-fasc" board, which is fine, but it then should be defined as such in the heading and the rules.

I personally would have no issue with a"FASC long only" board, but this board was advertised as a stock discussion board, with all opinions being welcome. The fact that I am being threatened to be removed for asking an extremely relevant question, to which the answer holds enormous ramifications to my investment, puts serious doubts in that premise.

I asked exactly what I said that breaks any of the stated rules, and have not gotten a single reply. My guess is that is because there was nothing in my posts that demonstrated such. All I recieved was a rude reply that basically said "your question was answered, accept it and leave it at that". First of all, the answers I received did not answer my question, or address my concern. Second, is it the position of the board monitors here that you are to accept whatever replies are provided to you as gospel, and move on?

Again, this is not the open discussion board that was advertised, or that I thought it would be. My suggestion to the board monitors is to change the name to a FASC long board. That way, everyone knows what to expect, and will at least understand what is expected from them, and invgestors will choose to post and read the board or not accordingly.


Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today