chambers fairly warned and fairly treated, is there a difference? Just wondering.
I am also a FASC shareholder and the only thing this board cares to do is RAH! RAH! the stock, which is fine. But, there are some of us that have the desire to look at all sides of our investment, not just the few positives, the awesome potential that may eventually (if ever) develop, or the thousand and one areas they could wonder into if those industries ever find out about FASC. But, that's hard to do with a clique working against you that doesn't want to discuss the fact those may or may not be realistic.
If one dares step into that forbidden area, then it's thrown into the ominous umbrella of "FLAME." Which can go down to if I say "No" to your "Yes" then I'm flaming?
The prejudice towards certain posters has always been obvious by yourself and now bobsnook. That's just an observation.
As I stated before and I see that neither of you answered the question, "Where was your sense of human decency with Tenzzi post that Matt had to erase from this board?" Or better yet, where was even the "fair" warning? Or, doesn't that apply to the "friends" of the board. You may want to remember that Tezzi's post was not removed by either one of you. Yet, you're both attacking cantstandsya for no other reason than asking questions about a stock he's invested in and others on this board are interested and certainly don't find it as "flaming" at all. But, then sneaky little emails might be the answer, "10Z I have tried to eamil you there in the past and would not go thru so try me at chambers74003@yahoo.com"
Patrick Henry shouted "Give me Liberty, or give me death!" To which the American Colonies found to be inspirational. The British found it to be flaming. Perception is in the eye of the viewer. Usually a good viewer tries to be perceptive to the benefit of all that post, not just a chosen few.
cantstandsya, your question, "please provide me with any single violation my posts supposedly committed?" Please see my post 2142. There was absolutely no violation by you. Just what appears to be bias towards you. But cantstandsya you can take solace in knowing that tomorrow morning some of these same will ask the Lord for fairness; but, believe me, they'll ask Him to use His definition, not their definition.
Sorry to all you Philadelphia fans and fans of Smarty Jones that he lost.
And, while some may consider President Reagan the greatest president in the 20th century. I'll just say, it is highly debatable and while he was a good president and maybe even a great one, he certainly wasn't the greatest of the twentieth century.
Now so no one gets their shorts up tight over this post, it is not meant to be inflammatory or flaming or any other such use of the word flame. Just to try to get the same fairness in treatment for those who have negative questions and comments about the stock that is given to those that only have positive questions and comments about the stock. Which should be the objective of all boards and their monitors.
Please have a Happy Lord's Day tomorrow.
All IMO.
