D Mecatronics Inc. (fka DMTA)

[Play_Chips]

Clearly the regulatory bodies have cited “Adequate current public information” concerning the Securities of D Mecatronics within the meaning of rule 144(c) (2) under the Securities Act.

May I kindly ask where you have located any discrepancies in the D Mecatronics preparation of Disclosure?
D Mecatronics Inc. Aims to Create the Most Transparency for Investors

http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15713

http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15713

http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15205

http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15185

http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=15184

Note the forgoing, and you will clearly observe that not all “buyouts” go according to understanding, do you think the Shareholders of Yahoo are now calming the CEO is a some part of an illicit scheme?

Yahoo, which has been slammed by investors walking away from the stock since Microsoft said it was no longer interested in acquiring the entire company at $33 a share, laid out these complaints:

• Microsoft was unresponsive to multiple requests

--No response to regulatory information requests

--No response to non-price terms, including value protection for stock component and regulatory issues

--No revised price indication until several months into the process, days before withdrawing

• Microsoft's actions and statements were inconsistent

--Publicly announced an unsolicited offer

--Threatened withdrawal

--Threatened to lower price

--Threatened proxy fight

--Only orally indicated possible increase in price after several months of discussions

--Initially stated "a few" more dollars, then "a couple" more dollars per share

--Withdrew offer within days of suggesting there "could be" an increase in price

--Ultimately proposed search-only "hybrid" transaction

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9980498-7.html