News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 325
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2008

Re: DewDiligence post# 63339

Monday, 06/09/2008 10:01:08 PM

Monday, June 09, 2008 10:01:08 PM

Post# of 257253
True, SVR12 is less predictable of SVR in this group of patients. However, with a range of figures from 41-73% for prior treatment failure patients, it is almost certain that the final SVR is going to be materially higher than that linked to in your post 26290780, at least in the relapser group, the number is likely to remain very high. It would seem in this study patients had already gone through the treatment, knew what to expect, and were determined to see it through. I would suspect a lower level of drop outs to help account for the higher SVR12 results than even seen in Prove 2 (this without utilizing the 8 week determination).

The omission of RVR may be an oversight, but not likely given VRTX's usual method of pushing anything positive out.

So it appears to me, as to what I understand to be the most numerous group of prior failure patients, SVR numbers in excess of your 85% Prove 3 approval number of 30% I believe, will almost certainly shatter this number. The other 2 arms will be much closer. Either way, the numbers should exceed what anyone was expecting. I was expecting 35-45% SVR.

Tinker

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now