lentinman, not intended as a "bogus" list. I wouldn't even attempt to dd that many stocks with any accuracy. I'm sure there are many in that list that should be considered legitimate.
My reasons for posting the list were more as a reference in determining future "saturation" and the effects going forward. We are speculating on that 75% not there 3 years ago and doubling in 3 years. That list could eliminate future statistical speculation, adding to it, updating it, etc.