News Focus
News Focus
Followers 153
Posts 12276
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/02/2007

Re: curber post# 110426

Saturday, 05/17/2008 2:19:17 AM

Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:19:17 AM

Post# of 222470
Disclosure has always been a head scratcher for me-- wouldn't they be in violation of the anti-fraud and anti-touting provisions of federal securities laws if they didn't? Example:

"...The authors of the spams, online newsletters, message board postings and Web sites unlawfully touted more than 235 Microcap companies, by either: (1) lying about the companies; (2) lying about their own "independence" from the companies; and/or (3) failing to disclose adequately the nature, source and amount of compensation paid by the companies. The creators of the Internet touts purported to provide unbiased opinions in their recommendations, but failed to disclose that they had received in total more than $6.3 million and nearly two million shares of cheap insider stock and options in exchange for touting services. In some instances, the fraudsters sold their stock or exercised their options immediately following their recommendations, a deceptive practice commonly referred to as "scalping." "
http://ftp.sec.gov/news/headlines/netfraud.htm

How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.
Abraham Lincoln


Unleash the power of Level 2

Spot liquidity moves with access to US order books.

Sign Up