This is what I can see (or at least gather from what I see lol) UC bummed money using a cert he knew would be cancelled by etgmf as collaterol. UC was in at the very least a signatory capacity in the financial dealings of 1010 sask ltd. therefore uc basically defaulted our claims to himself after payiong himnself to put them in cmkm. it shows the plan was to do just that and then to sell them to etgmf for shares they planned to cancel for non performance.
I think koch gave uc the authority to use the shares because they all knew (including etgmf) that the lawsuit to cancell all the shares in the deals would be filed and the shares would be cancelled by court action for non performance of the contract.
But qa silly thing happened. KW got his hands on some some info that equated a loose thread on a favorite old sweater.
it appears the sligtest lil tug is causing things to unravel a bit.
Now I believe it will be pretty easy to prove the default to 1010 was planned as was the suit by etgmf to cancel the shares.
again its supposition but thats what I see forming here.