Friday, April 25, 2008 4:55:38 PM
The point, abbytraderwin, is that ADCS claimed to have increased the O/S to obtain favorable terms for a piece of property that is owned by a guy that's already on their payroll. It didn't cost ADCS a dime but the shareholders got to fork over almost the entire value of the property up front. What a great deal for them;)
銀風
"I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said."
Recent PAOG News
- PAO Group, Inc. Announces Rescission of Agreement and Departure of CEO James Schramm • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/19/2026 06:33:33 PM
- LAW90 Launches Revolutionary AI Positioning Program, Expands Into Texas Market, and Announces National Hiring for 2026 • ACCESS Newswire • 11/19/2025 02:00:00 PM
