A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[squashthebug]

Thanks for the answer. I was thinking about the purpose of AIM. Looking at some random back testing atleast since 2000, ( I have not been able to use vealies)it looks like often Buy and Hold has a better performance. Perhaps the Time of entrance skews the performance. My question: Is Aim's basic utility Risk adjusted performance or it is really better than Buy and Hold assuming good stock or fund selection?