InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 5631

Friday, 04/11/2008 3:04:33 PM

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:04:33 PM

Post# of 12660
"If the welfare of cancer patients were the main issue, wouldn’t you want DNDN to wait for another 56 events (360-204) in order to give the trial the best possible chance to succeed?

From a patient-advocacy standpoint, surely the delay in obtaining 56 more events pales in comparison to the nightmare scenario where: a) Provenge really does have good efficacy; b) the new 9902b trial fails; and c) the old 9902b trial would have succeeded."

You describe my nightmare - I wish they would have left the trial alone and waited for those hopefully 56 high HR events. Obtaining financing certainly those not seem to be a problem for them. Waiting another 6 to 12 months would not have been such a big deal since the trial has already been going on for nearly 5 years.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.