News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2
Posts 283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 5631

Friday, 04/11/2008 3:04:33 PM

Friday, April 11, 2008 3:04:33 PM

Post# of 12660
"If the welfare of cancer patients were the main issue, wouldn’t you want DNDN to wait for another 56 events (360-204) in order to give the trial the best possible chance to succeed?

From a patient-advocacy standpoint, surely the delay in obtaining 56 more events pales in comparison to the nightmare scenario where: a) Provenge really does have good efficacy; b) the new 9902b trial fails; and c) the old 9902b trial would have succeeded."

You describe my nightmare - I wish they would have left the trial alone and waited for those hopefully 56 high HR events. Obtaining financing certainly those not seem to be a problem for them. Waiting another 6 to 12 months would not have been such a big deal since the trial has already been going on for nearly 5 years.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today