Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,782.81
(
2.51%
)
US TECH 100
24,200.40
(
2.79%
)
Dow Jones
47,909.92
(
2.85%
)
Brent Oil
94.84
(
-6.30%
)
Bitcoin
71,430.51
(
-0.77%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 435767
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

jhaw

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

jhaw

Re: whizzeresq post# 215111

Wednesday, 04/09/2008 12:49:43 PM

Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:49:43 PM

Post# of 435767
whizzeresq,

I am not a lawyer, but the Batts decision certainly seems like a very strange ruling. I found your point #4 particularly surprising. If Judge Batts has the authority to order a stay or dismissal of the ITC investigation, then so be it. But she is requiring IDCC to make motions in that case that are contrary to IDCC's best interests. Has this ever been done before and is there any legal precedent? It seems crazy that a judge can control the manner in which a party prosecutes a case before another judge, even if it is an ALJ. Am I simply ignorant regarding the law or is Judge Batts just making stuff up as she goes?

jhaw
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News