Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:50:47 AM
Infinite re Nokia's direction with the FRAND issue you said:
...."jhaw/loop, I think the logic here is that the ITC cannot issue an injunction banning import of infringing products because IDCC has submitted a written statement saying it will offer FRAND terms to manufacturers whose products are built to the 3G standards. Apparently, the expert for NOK is saying that in the event the IPR holder and a potential licensee cannot agree on the price for the license then they must go to court and let the courts decide a FRAND rate."
I think that Nokia might be trying to make its dispute with IDCC more of a FRAND issue rather than an infringement issue. This is a direction with the ITC that I thought Nokia might try to pursue when I asked the following question of Whizzer in a previous post:
5) In your opinion, is the following scenerio even plausible?:
Could Nokia/Samsung possibly argue against an immediate injunction by the ITC due to the limited number of infringed IDCC essential patents compared to the total number of essential patents required to make a 3G compliant handset? Therefore they know they need to license with IDCC, but only at "FRAND" royalty rate. They would then argue that since they can't agree with IDCC on a "FRAND" rate, then it needs to be determined by the COURTS. Thus the possible injunction might be delayed until after a court ruling on what would be a fair royalty rate.
In another post, I asked the following:
Will the Tier 1 companies license with IDCC for 3G in 2008? Will a favorable ITC ruling necessarily result in licenses with Nokia/Samsung, or do we still have to wait for a court resolution of the FRAND royalty issue, which I think has caused the licensing impasse all along. If the courts get involved, then I don't foresee a Tier 1 license until 2009.
The above question and other questions that I asked Whizzer about the ITC case in the following linked post:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26086689
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26104216
Whizzer's thoughtful replies to my questions in the following linked posts:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26093030
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26109900
...."jhaw/loop, I think the logic here is that the ITC cannot issue an injunction banning import of infringing products because IDCC has submitted a written statement saying it will offer FRAND terms to manufacturers whose products are built to the 3G standards. Apparently, the expert for NOK is saying that in the event the IPR holder and a potential licensee cannot agree on the price for the license then they must go to court and let the courts decide a FRAND rate."
I think that Nokia might be trying to make its dispute with IDCC more of a FRAND issue rather than an infringement issue. This is a direction with the ITC that I thought Nokia might try to pursue when I asked the following question of Whizzer in a previous post:
5) In your opinion, is the following scenerio even plausible?:
Could Nokia/Samsung possibly argue against an immediate injunction by the ITC due to the limited number of infringed IDCC essential patents compared to the total number of essential patents required to make a 3G compliant handset? Therefore they know they need to license with IDCC, but only at "FRAND" royalty rate. They would then argue that since they can't agree with IDCC on a "FRAND" rate, then it needs to be determined by the COURTS. Thus the possible injunction might be delayed until after a court ruling on what would be a fair royalty rate.
In another post, I asked the following:
Will the Tier 1 companies license with IDCC for 3G in 2008? Will a favorable ITC ruling necessarily result in licenses with Nokia/Samsung, or do we still have to wait for a court resolution of the FRAND royalty issue, which I think has caused the licensing impasse all along. If the courts get involved, then I don't foresee a Tier 1 license until 2009.
The above question and other questions that I asked Whizzer about the ITC case in the following linked post:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26086689
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26104216
Whizzer's thoughtful replies to my questions in the following linked posts:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26093030
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=26109900
Recent IDCC News
- InterDigital to Spotlight Sensing Expertise and Innovation at IEEE ICC’26 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/26/2026 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Expands IoT Licensing Push With New Fintech Patent Agreement (IDCC) • IH Market News • 05/19/2026 02:46:36 PM
- InterDigital signs license agreement with fintech company • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/19/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2026 08:12:13 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/05/2026 08:52:23 PM
- Investor Conference Presentations Scheduled as InterDigital (IDCC) Engages Market Through June • IH Market News • 05/05/2026 02:32:32 PM
- InterDigital to Present at Four Upcoming Investor Conferences • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/05/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form ARS - Annual Report to Security Holders • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:19:31 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:17:58 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:15:45 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 12:34:10 PM
- InterDigital Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/30/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form SCHEDULE 13G/A - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 08:11:55 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 11:00:56 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:52 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:12 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:58:36 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:57 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:23 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:55:47 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:54:42 AM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/20/2026 08:30:51 PM
- InterDigital’s NAB Showcase to Spotlight HDR Innovation for Advanced and Ad-Supported Streaming • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/16/2026 12:00:00 PM
