rev"is, concerning your statement "It would have to be NOK providing clear and convincing evidence that IDCC patents are essential.", it may depend on whether IDCC has declared the patents to be essential, which I assume they have since Mr. Aynes brought the argument, that causes the first hurdle to be crossed. Just an observation. However, after reading Mr. Aynes "expert" opinion, I have a very hard time believing the Judge would accept any of that crap. There is so much convoluted thinking in his statement that it's difficult to even discuss it, IMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
