The Question and Answer Board

[crashman]

Ok, here is a problem, and I hope you are not going to say "just don't post there anymore".
Some boards like WNBD and SWVC are moderated by very biased members. I happen to be more shall I say 'objective' on these stocks and post when I can. Here are todays statistics on my posts on WNBD which are typical for these boards:
I posted about 20 posts
8 of the posts got deleted
all of the deleted post restored after I protested to the admin
I got one foul language pm send to me

Good news:
I have to say, without me being able to see the post deletions and being able to protest them, I probably would be banned already for "too many deleted posts" like I was prior to this feature
Bad news:
The moderator(s) keep deleting my posts no matter what and it is a lot of work for me (and maybe the admin) to get them restored every time. 2 of the board moderators have send me pm's telling me that they will delete my posts because of my negative stance on the stocks.

So my question is, shouldn't board moderators:
A) be selected to be impartial and/or
B) be monitored for their behavior when it comes to posting/deleting

BTW. I'm not the only poster to be treated that way on those boards.