I have nothing against Phil at all . I just think its very questionable that he is their "spokes person" . What kind of legit company chooses someone they have never met or have anything invested to represent them in a indirect form on a public board ??? To me that could be considered insider trading on a smaller degree . Don't get me wrong , I am glad they are atleast doing that considering all of the things that are going south for the company but its also a huge RED FLAG at the same time .