News Focus
News Focus
Followers 68
Posts 1204
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: rmarchma post# 60671

Saturday, 03/06/2004 1:01:08 PM

Saturday, March 06, 2004 1:01:08 PM

Post# of 436089
rmarchma, have you considered the possibility that LU is not disputing the essentiality of IDCC's CDMA2000 patents - that only the Tantivy CDMA2000 patents are being disputed?

I believe that the real sticking point between LU and IDCC is the overall CDMA2000 rate. I think they had come to terms in principal on WCDMA (FDD and TDD) and TDMA/GPRS/EDGE. I believe that LU offered some lower rate for CDMA2000 than IDCC is now asking for, based on the strength of the combined IDCC/Tantivy patents.

If I'm right, then there would be no need to risk any of the WCDMA or IDCC-originated CDMA2000 patents in a suit. The only thing that would need to be resolved between them is the essentiality and infringement of the Tantivy patents.


i_q

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News