InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[bulldzr]

rmarchma, your questions and concerns seem valid to me, and are shared by many here...I hope that what many others say is true that it is a strategic move by IDCC. I also suspect, as you do as well I imagine that most of the questions you have suggested for the CC won't be asked, and wouldn't be answered it they were. I think we can forget about anything of substance to be shared concerning either the LU lawsuit ("We can't comment about current litigation..."), or the NOK arbitration ("things are going along as expected...these things take time...etc."), or even the JPO issues.

From your post...

"One reason for my question on this matter is to get IDCC to reaffirm in a public CC to others that IDCC does have essential patents in CDMA2000, outside of the Tantivy patents. However, I am still confused over the strategy of just using the Tantivy patents in the litigation suit."

As ST1640 and others have pointed out...our Company's abilities in spelling and grammar is somewhat lacking. Is it possible that patent applications filled with similar mistakes can cause problems with the patent authorities and effect the enforcement thereof? I don't know this, maybe sjratty and other legal types can comment...but for instance if IDCC applied for a cellular communications patent and it read like "cellaloid computations" wouldn't we expect the JPO to have a problem with it?...LOL!

Have a great weekend! I'm going Rodeo-ing!

http://www.rodeohouston.com

My 12 year old son won us some tickets by winning "Best of Show" in his School District...Yeah!

http://www.rodeohouston.com/education/school_art_prog.aspx