News Focus
News Focus
Followers 362
Posts 100378
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/22/2006

Re: redskiesatnight post# 290436

Wednesday, 12/12/2007 12:26:35 AM

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:26:35 AM

Post# of 311080
Just because the naked shorters did not follow the law and cover according to the Reg Sho grand-daddy clause elimination does not, in any way, imply that there is no naked short position.
1. Sorry ... Loftwerks came into existence after the grandfather clause came into effect, so it never did apply to Loftwerks. LOL

2. There has never been one ounce of proof that a naked short position existed.

3. We do know that a Pump & Dump was executed via the Nominee Accounts.

4. The naked short story comes up as the last gasp explanation by the Koolaid Korps to explain the volume, when they can not accept that fact that management Pumped and Dumped them. LOL


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y