Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,064.01
(
-0.63%
)
US TECH 100
25,960.80
(
0.73%
)
Dow Jones
49,149.38
(
-0.60%
)
Brent Oil
94.97
(
-0.05%
)
Bitcoin
78,235.93
(
2.50%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 311080
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

redskiesatnight

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 15
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

redskiesatnight

Re: EarnestDD post# 290434

Wednesday, 12/12/2007 12:07:28 AM

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:07:28 AM

Post# of 311080
Earnest, Earnest, Earnest! Just because the naked shorters
did not follow the law and cover according to the Reg Sho grand-daddy clause elimination does not, in any way, imply that there is no naked short position.

All one has to do is understand that if the company crashes completey then they never have to cover. Very interesting if you ask me!

(imo) REDSKIESATNIGHT
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote