Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,520.84
(
0.02%
)
US TECH 100
29,169.80
(
-0.14%
)
Dow Jones
50,685.78
(
0.44%
)
Brent Oil
93.64
(
-3.45%
)
Bitcoin
74,897.88
(
-1.25%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 436090
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

mschere

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 75
Posts 19489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

mschere

Member Level

Re: loophole73 post# 199914

Tuesday, 12/11/2007 11:18:00 AM

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:18:00 AM

Post# of 436090
Question..At this point can IDCC File a motion for contempt, requiring Samsung to provide their covered 2006 sales as that was provided in the Court Validated Arbitral Award.? Those Samsung 2006 sales are already established by Independent Third Party Research Firms.TIA

Unfortunately we got 4/5ths of the loaf complete via a money judgment. 2006 has not been determined even though the award stated the royalty rate, sales reporting dates and the terms of payment.


mschere

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News