Home > Boards > US Listed > Biotechs > ImClone Systems Inc (formerly IMCL)

Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer.Jonker DJ,

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Telephonics Member Profile
 
Followed By 3
Posts 1,303
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/02/03
160x600 placeholder
Telephonics   Thursday, 11/22/07 10:07:43 AM
Re: None
Post # of 4764 
Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer.Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. djonker@ottawahospital.on.ca

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab, an IgG1 chimeric monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity against colorectal cancers that express EGFR. METHODS: From December 2003 to August 2005, 572 patients who had colorectal cancer expressing immunohistochemically detectable EGFR and who had been previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin or had contraindications to treatment with these drugs underwent randomization to an initial dose of 400 mg of cetuximab per square meter of body-surface area followed by a weekly infusion of 250 mg per square meter plus best supportive care (287 patients) or best supportive care alone (285 patients). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: In comparison with best supportive care alone, cetuximab treatment was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.92; P=0.005) and in progression-free survival (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80; P<0.001). These benefits were robust after adjustment in a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model. The median overall survival was 6.1 months in the cetuximab group and 4.6 months in the group assigned to supportive care alone. Partial responses occurred in 23 patients (8.0%) in the cetuximab group but in none in the group assigned to supportive care alone (P<0.001); the disease was stable in an additional 31.4% of patients assigned to cetuximab and in 10.9% of patients assigned to supportive care alone (P<0.001). Quality of life was better preserved in the cetuximab group, with less deterioration in physical function and global health status scores (both P<0.05). Cetuximab treatment was associated with a characteristic rash; a rash of grade 2 or higher was strongly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.50; P<0.001). The incidence of any adverse event of grade 3 or higher was 78.5% in the cetuximab group and 59.1% in the group assigned to supportive care alone (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab improves overall survival and progression-free survival and preserves quality-of-life measures in patients with colorectal cancer in whom other treatments have failed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

PMID: 18003960 [PubMed - in process]

Related LinksSystematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Health Technol Assess. 2007]Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. [N Engl J Med. 2006]Cetuximab: an epidermal growth factor receptor chemeric human-murine monoclonal antibody. [Drugs Today (Barc). 2005]Cetuximab: an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody for the treatment of colorectal cancer. [Clin Ther. 2005]Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. [N Engl J Med. 2004]See all Related Articles...Display

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences