News Focus
News Focus
Followers 5
Posts 142
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/02/2003

Re: None

Wednesday, 11/07/2007 10:31:57 PM

Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:31:57 PM

Post# of 157300
The following is item #32

from GTEM's(Wells Notice) suit against Monterosso:

"32. Defendant maliciously threatened to damage the Plaintiff and it's employees by accusing them of violation of Federal Securities Laws and to expose them to disgrace unless his demands were met regarding the Separation Agreement. Defendant's malicious actions are ongoing."

Now that is really funny -- the SEC has issued a Wells Notice to GTEM accusing them, GTEM(Wells Notice) of, among other things -- FRAUD!!!!!

The question is . . . why didn't GTEM(Wells Notice) include the SEC as a co-defendant in this matter?????




Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today