Wednesday, November 07, 2007 6:17:48 AM
I do not doubt the integrity of Wick, but there are logical reasons to doubt the source of where that email had come from.
I have many thoughts, pro and con, that could come from that email if such is factual, but none would mean anything until some “final official confirmation” takes place to inform the public (again) who is in charge. As it stands, unless the filings are rescinded, retracted, or amended, they have to be given some consideration to still be in tact.
If that email is from a true source, then the first thing that needs to be done and should have been done a long time ago would be to rescind the filings.
PS-Heck, I dozed off last night. I had a few pros and cons to share about the email, but from reading the board, it looks like most of them have been discussed.
v/r
Sterling
Sterling's Trading & Investing Strategies:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29867262
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
Cannabix Technologies Announces Commercial Launch of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) • BLOZF • Mar 16, 2026 8:37 AM
Exxe Group Advances Platform Strategy and Share Structure Reduction Following Strategic Meetings • AXXA • Mar 11, 2026 1:03 PM
