She has already shown us what she is made of...repeatedly.
1. Freely admits posting personal private information about anyone she choses. Threatens opponents with this when her argument fails to hold up to review.
2. Presents ancient (10 or more years old) news as "current" and as support for her "argument".
3. Her opening shot is Namecalling. Either a company officer or her opponent is a liar, con artist, cheat, etc.
While I agree that a negative side must be allowed to be presented, as you have said yourself there are better ways to do it. Even a cursory review of her postings here at IHUB shows she staunchly refuses to alter her tactics. Throw in her exploits at RB and Yahoo, the pattern is clear. She hammers away at the boards of a couple of securities at most. When they reach sub.20 range she moves to another security. Her current focus is NPCT. Watch, if NPCT gets down around .10 she'll be bashing something else. I don't know anything about NPCT. It may be a bad company. But the pattern she shows is clear. She comes in blazing away after the stock has dropped significantly. As I've said before, Where was the great savior of the small investor when ASTN was at $15, or $10, or $5, or $2? It would have been much more relevant to post some of what she had to say before the stock dropped 90%. Same goes for any other company she has bashed. It is easy to kick a dog that is almost dead.
She offers nothing constructive, little that is relevant and generally makes folks feel bad just reading her ranting. Kind of like a certain someone that was booted recently. Ironically, it was right after a fight with her that he got canned.
Surely under the new business structure, the Business Plan she hacked from the site no longer holds any value if she should release it publically as retribution for her being terminated?
That is the only reason you let her get away with all of this isn't it?
Pretty bad when you have to blackmail a message board to keep your posting privileges.
The Bird of Prey
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
