News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 371
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/07/2001

Re: long-gone post# 233

Monday, 12/17/2001 11:43:34 AM

Monday, December 17, 2001 11:43:34 AM

Post# of 416
To:John Barendrecht who wrote (273)
From: mikesloan Monday, Jul 7, 1997 1:03 PM
Respond to of 80032

All a question of the right time
Australian Financial Review July 8/97

Comment, by Joanne Gray

The Reserve Bank could have mounted an argument for
cutting its gold holdings in the early 1980s as gold
reserves had become increasingly irrelevant as a strategic
reserve, and were a mediocre investment in terms of
earnings.

But the right conjunction of fiscal, economic and political
circumstances for a massive sale of gold reserves only
recently occurred.

A sale by the RBA of two-thirds of its gold reserves in
the late 1980s or early 1990s could easily have had a
devastating impact on the currency which at that time was
prone to sharp swings in value. Since then changes in the
Australian dollar's value have been less dramatic and
more gradual.

Foreign-exchange commentators say the $A has
remained surprisingly resilient since the sale of $2.4 billion
in official gold reserves was announced, and is still above
the levels it reached after the last official interest rate cut
in May.

Another uncertainty could have been the Government's
reaction to the sales, and a cash-strapped government
may have been tempted to appropriate some if not all of
the profits from the sale.

But there was little danger of that with the Coalition
Government, which has made substantial progress on
cutting back spending and is regarded as taking its
charter of Budget honesty seriously.

The reserves are available to underpin Reserve Bank
action in foreign exchange and other financial markets in
the event of a crisis, and are also notionally available in
the event that a solvent bank faces a liquidity crisis.

Siphoning off some of those would have been the wrong
signal for financial markets and a dangerous political
statement.

It was therefore unlikely that Mr Costello would move to
appropriate the proceeds for a short-term boost to the
federal Budget bottom line. The Treasurer accepted the
RBA's clear-cut submission that it was simply shifting
assets from one class to another, and there was never a
question that it would not keep the proceeds of the sales
as part of its official reserves.

The bank's gold sales were always going to have an
impact on the price of gold and gold producers' shares.
But so far at least, the sale hasn't caused the gold price to
fall as far as it did in the first two months of this year
when the markets learned a central bank, later revealed
as the Dutch, was selling substantial gold assets. In those
two months, the price fell $US30.

The RBA has gone through several shifts in the make-up
of the portfolio of international reserves since the 1970s.

It scaled back reserves of sterling-denominated securities
in the 1970s, moving its international assets into US
dollars because of the diminishing importance of Britain
as a trading partner, and the declining value of its
currency. Since then yen- and deutschmark-denominated
assets have grown in significance in the RBA's reserves.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=1714142