nuffie, ... Unlike you, I am not obsessed with things CMKX. My losses do not color my perception of what is or can be going on. I have no money at stake here.
I'm here to be a witness if anyone who scammed me in ECNI gets their head handed to them by the DOJ. We both know there is substantial overlap in the "minor" scamsters.
But, I have sympathy for CMKX stuckholders. They may be naive and greedy and easily taken advantage of - but they were really, really scammed. And, there has been much misinformed BS posted about the effect the lawsuits filed by CMKIX will have (rather than could have).
And, when I see posts (like yours that Edwards was served by publication when permission to do so was granted but the court record shows only an attempt at a certified mailing service and no service by publication) I try to set the record straight. My perspective is that of a trial lawyer (though not in Nevada). I deal with issues like service of process, amendment of complaints, discovery, subpoenas, motions and the lengthy and sometimes gruelling process of getting ready to tell a cogent and convincing story in court.
While discovery may be taking place and subpoenas may be flying about, it doesn't change the fact that whatever is discovered about Edwards and his assets will be of no avail if Edwards is never properly served. And, the same goes for UC. Both will eventually be dismissed from the suits if a timely good faith attempt to serve them is not shown to the judge. So far, I do not see the attempts in what the court records show (and that's what counts - not self-serving letters posted on a website). ... eom
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
